Topic · 7 stories
Workplace surveillance: employee monitoring, news
In short
Workplace surveillance is the use of software, cameras and sensors to monitor employees' activity, location and performance. It is legal in most places within limits that differ by country: the EU requires informing and consulting workers, some US states require notice, and Poland allows video and email monitoring only when necessary and announced. In 2026 a New Jersey lawsuit described a firing over webcam photos every three minutes, and Meta paused keystroke logging after an internal data leak.
What is employee monitoring and employee monitoring software
Employee monitoring is the use of software, cameras and sensors to track employees’ activity, location and performance, and employee monitoring software is the program that does it on work devices. Critics call it bossware. Tools in the 2026 stories log keystrokes and mouse movements, track browsers, messaging and meeting apps, photograph remote workers by webcam, read the content of calls, emails and messages, and report location from a phone. According to reporting, nearly 70% of firms with more than 500 employees already used monitoring systems in 2022. In Europe the data falls under the GDPR, and breaches can be penalised as described in GDPR fines.
Is employee monitoring software legal
Mostly yes, but the limits depend on where the employer and worker are. An OECD study of more than 6,000 firms in six countries found that US employers use sanctioning software far more than European ones: 67% against 4% in France, Germany, Italy and Spain combined and 1% in Japan. US firms track work speed at 72% and message content at 55%; European firms at 15% and 6%. Researchers attribute the gap to law, not technology: EU rules require informing and consulting worker representatives before rollout, while US labor law requires bargaining only in narrower circumstances.
Some US states, including New York, Connecticut, Delaware and Maine, require employers to notify workers about monitoring, but the rules leave gaps. In Canada, workers in Ontario have few defences: the federal privacy law PIPEDA does not cover provincially regulated employers, and since October 2022 firms with at least 25 employees must have a written monitoring policy. It requires disclosure only, with no right to object.
What Polish law allows
Polish law allows video and email monitoring only when it is necessary for set purposes and workers are told in advance. From the consolidated Labour Code of 2026, checked on 10 October 2026:
- Video monitoring (Article 22²). Allowed if necessary for employee safety, protection of property, production control or keeping confidential information secret. It excludes union premises, and also sanitary rooms, changing rooms, canteens and smoking rooms unless strictly necessary and not harmful to dignity. Footage is kept for up to 3 months, longer only if it is evidence in proceedings, then destroyed.
- Notice. Purposes, scope and method are set in a collective agreement, work regulations or a notice. Employees are told at least 2 weeks before launch, and since 27 January 2026 also before they start work, on paper or electronically. Monitored areas are marked at least a day before.
- Email and other monitoring (Article 22³). Checking a work email account is allowed when necessary to organise work and use work tools properly, and must not breach the secrecy of correspondence. The same notice rules apply, and paragraph 4 extends them to other forms of monitoring necessary for the same purposes.
The text of these articles does not name keystroke logging or webcam photos. GDPR information duties apply alongside (Article 22² paragraph 10).
What data does employee monitoring software collect and share
It collects identifying data, online activity, IP addresses, device data and location, and some of it goes to third parties. Researchers from Vanderbilt University, Northeastern University and UC Berkeley deployed nine popular platforms, including Hubstaff, Deputy and Time Doctor 2. Every platform sent names and email addresses to outside companies (121 documented cases), and data went to 145 third-party domains, including Facebook and the Russian search engine Yandex.
A third of the platforms could track a worker’s precise location in the background or off the clock, and three required access to a phone’s motion sensors just to clock in. It is the same mechanism covered under online tracking.
Keystroke logging and AI training: Meta and TD Bank
In 2026 companies tried to collect keystrokes and mouse movements as AI training data, then pulled back after protests and a leak. Meta paused its Model Capability Initiative, which logged the keystrokes and mouse movements of most US employees: a screenshot showed private conversations, performance data and transcriptions readable across the company, and a security notice put the exposure at data from 45,000 Hive tables. Employees could not opt out on company laptops, and a petition gathered 1,600 signatures.
In July, Meta’s CTO Andrew Bosworth confirmed that a researcher had moved sensitive data to an internal location where it should not be, with no outside intrusion. Meta also expanded opt-outs because the data was too uniform for AI training. The logging stays dormant, and Meta has not decided what to do with the data already collected. Toronto-Dominion Bank backed off collecting keystrokes for AI after pushback but kept WorkiQ, which tracks browsers, messaging and meeting apps. See Meta.
Webcam photos every three minutes: the New Jersey lawsuit
A New Jersey lawsuit alleges a remote worker was fired for refusing an AI tool that would photograph her about every three minutes. Glennis Von Sander-Timinski sued Sutherland Healthcare Solutions: the Sentinel AI tool would take about 160 photos a day. She had worked remotely since 2018 with positive reviews. She feared the pressure would trigger a lupus flare-up, and her doctor asked for less frequent or intermittent monitoring.
The company gave her three options: accept the monitoring, report to an office about six hours away each day, or be dismissed. She was dismissed on 8 September. Her lawyers accuse the company of failing to provide the reasonable accommodation New Jersey law requires. These are allegations in a complaint, not a ruling.
What are surveillance wages
Surveillance wages are pay set from a worker’s personal data to find the lowest amount they will accept. An audit of 500 labor-management AI companies by UC Irvine law professor Veena Dubal and Wilneida Negrón, published in August 2025, named Intuit, Salesforce, Colgate-Palmolive, Amwell and Healthcare Services Group among customers of vendors whose tools enable the practice. It does not claim all of them engage in it, and Colgate-Palmolive and Intuit denied using such tools. Systems can draw on signs of financial distress, such as payday loans, and on public social media profiles for union sympathies or pregnancy. Colorado’s proposed Prohibit Surveillance Data to Set Prices and Wages Act would ban using intimate data for algorithmic pay.
What it means for you
- Ask your employer what employee data it collects, and keep sensitive personal matters off work devices. Experts gave that advice in reporting on the monitoring-app study.
- In Poland, check the work regulations or notice: purposes, scope and method of monitoring must be set there, and you must be told at least 2 weeks ahead.
- With remote work and webcam tools, ask for the legal basis. Articles 22² and 22³ do not name such tools.
- If you work for a US employer in New York, Connecticut, Delaware or Maine, the employer must notify you about monitoring.
Still open: what Meta will do with the data it already collected, how the New Jersey court rules on the accommodation claim, and whether Colorado bans surveillance-based pay.
Key facts
- A New Jersey lawsuit alleges Sutherland Healthcare Solutions fired a remote worker on 8 September after she refused AI webcam monitoring that took about 160 photos a day. (source)
- OECD study of 6,000 firms: sanctioning software is used by 67% of US firms, 4% in France, Germany, Italy and Spain combined, and 1% in Japan. (source)
- An audit of 500 labor-management AI firms named Intuit, Salesforce and others among customers of tools that enable surveillance wages. The companies named deny using such tools. (source)
- Nine workplace monitoring apps sent worker data to 145 third-party domains, including Yandex. A third could track precise location off the clock. (source)
- Meta's CTO confirmed a researcher moved sensitive data from the keystroke-logging program to an internal location where it should not be. Over 1,600 employees signed a petition. (source)
- TD Bank scaled back plans to collect keystrokes and mouse movements for AI training. In Ontario employers must only disclose monitoring, not get consent. (source)
- Meta paused its Model Capability Initiative, which logged employees' keystrokes and mouse movements for AI training, after an internal leak. Employees could not opt out on company laptops. (source)
This edition was produced with artificial intelligence. Text and voice are generated automatically.
Timeline
- New Jersey Remote Worker Alleges Firing Over AI Webcam Monitoring Privacy
- OECD study: US employers punish workers with software 16 times more than Europe Privacy
- Audit links major employers to AI tools that set pay from personal data Privacy
- Workplace Monitoring Apps Share Worker Data With Facebook and Yandex Security
- Meta CTO Confirms Internal Data Leak in Keystroke Logging Program Privacy
- TD Bank Employee Surveillance Highlights Gaps in Canadian Privacy Law Privacy
- Meta Halts Keystroke Tracking for AI Training After Internal Leak Exposes Employee Data Privacy
FAQ
What is employee monitoring software?
Employee monitoring software is a program that records what employees do on work devices and, in some products, where they are. Reported examples in 2026 include webcam photos about every three minutes (Sentinel AI), tracking of browsers, messaging and meeting apps (WorkiQ at TD Bank), and logging of keystrokes and mouse movements (Meta). Employers use it to track work speed, message content and performance.
Is employee monitoring software legal?
Yes in most places, within limits that differ by country. EU rules require informing and consulting worker representatives before rollout, New York, Connecticut, Delaware and Maine require notice to workers, and Ontario requires a written policy for firms with 25 or more employees but no consent. In Poland, Labour Code Articles 22² and 22³ allow video and email monitoring only when necessary and announced at least two weeks ahead.
Do employee monitoring apps share data with third parties?
Yes. In a study of nine popular platforms, including Hubstaff, Deputy and Time Doctor 2, every one sent identifying worker data such as names and email addresses to outside companies, documented in 121 cases. Activity, IP addresses and device data went to 145 third-party domains, including Facebook and Yandex.
Has anyone been fired for refusing employee monitoring?
One US lawsuit alleges so, and no court has ruled yet. Glennis Von Sander-Timinski says Sutherland Healthcare Solutions fired her on 8 September 2026 after she refused an AI tool that would photograph her by webcam about every three minutes. Her lawyers accuse the company of failing to provide a reasonable accommodation under New Jersey law.
Did Meta track employees' keystrokes?
Yes. Meta's Model Capability Initiative recorded keystrokes and mouse movements of most US employees to train AI. Meta paused it in June 2026 after an internal leak exposed data from 45,000 Hive tables, and the logging remains dormant. Employees could not opt out on company laptops at first.
Is employee monitoring more common in the US than in Europe?
Yes, by a wide margin. An OECD study of more than 6,000 firms found that 67% of US firms use software that sanctions poor performance, against 4% in France, Germany, Italy and Spain combined. US employers track work speed at 72% versus 15% in Europe, and monitor message content at 55% versus 6%.